The Law Pt 2
The writer that I mentioned in the first blog, did include numerous scriptural references to bolster his argument for keeping the law, however he didn’t really expand or explore any of them so I didn’t include them in this blog.
The intent, as I understood the writer, is to “hear and obey” the law. The question that came to my mind was “hear what law, obey what law?” If the writer was suggesting believers today need to keep the laws of Moses then I would ask the writer of the email “do you keep the laws of Moses?” Are you “hearing and obeying” the laws of Moses? If I am not mistaken I believe there are over 600 of them! And though Jesus kept the law, He had to fulfill it, He broke a few in His earthly ministry too! Yes He did.
Matt 12:1-13 (YLT) “At that time did Jesus go on the sabbaths through the corn, and his disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck ears, and to eat, and the Pharisees having seen, said to him, `Lo, thy disciples do that which it is not lawful to do on a sabbath.’ And he said to them, `Did ye not read what David did, when he was hungry, himself and those with him– how he went into the house of God, and the loaves of the presentation did eat, which it is not lawful to him to eat, nor to those with him, except to the priests alone? `Or did ye not read in the Law, that on the sabbaths the priests in the temple do profane the sabbath, and are blameless? and I say to you, that a greater than the temple is here; and if ye had known what is: Kindness I will, and not sacrifice–ye had not condemned the blameless, for the son of man is lord even of the sabbath.’ And having departed thence, he went to their synagogue, and lo, there was a man having the hand withered, and they questioned him, saying, `Is it lawful to heal on the sabbaths?’ that they might accuse him. And he said to them, `What man shall be of you, who shall have one sheep, and if this may fall on the sabbaths into a ditch, will not lay hold on it and raise it? How much better, therefore, is a man than a sheep? –so that it is lawful on the sabbaths to do good.’ Then saith he to the man, `Stretch forth thy hand,’ and he stretched it forth, and it was restored whole as the other.”
Of course the Pharisee’s immediately began to plot Jesus’ death following this encounter. They, the Pharisee’s knew the end was near if someone with authority could challenge the most fundamental law of the Sabbath!
So, let’s ask ourselves, what is going on here? The answer lies in the letter to the Galatians, written by the Apostle Paul. The opening verses give the reader a quick look into the heart of what is to follow, namely a dispute between keeping the law or following on in faith. Let’s read portions of the letter and you will see what I am referring to.
The following argument, put forth by Paul, uses the story of Abraham and his two sons to demonstrate the difference between the law and grace. Let’s read it. Gal 4:21-31 (KJV “Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.”
Now, that’s an interesting question Paul raises “do you not hear the law…” The “law” is, somehow, speaking to us, the reader of this letter. How is that? Well, read on and you will “hear” the law speaking by means of an allegory or comparison between two things in which one represents the other.
Let’s take a closer look at the story Paul is referring to in writing about Hagar and her son. It takes place in Genesis the 16th chapter 1-3 “Now Sarai Abram’s wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar. And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.”
Here is the beginning of the story. Abraham takes Hagar (Agar in the KJV) and has a child with her; Ishmael. According to Paul Hagar is a bondwoman and her son “was born after the flesh…” This is what he compares Hagar and Ishmael to; a “bondwoman” and “the flesh.” Then Paul refines the allegory, the comparison by stating that Hagar is “mount Sinai in Arabia.” This is the mount where Moses and the people received the law from God. Hagar is that mount. And her son Ishmael? He must be, using the allegorical model that Paul has introduced, the “child” of the mother, the mount, and that would be the law. Let’s continue. Clearly in Paul’s writing here the law is bondage whereas the other son, Isaac, represents the “promise” and freedom. Finally, Paul clearly equates the two sons to the two covenants “Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants…” Which two covenants? The first; the covenant struck with Abraham. The second is the covenant struck with the people of Israel. The first covenant preceded the second and therefore, Paul argues, takes precedence over the second, the law. And what does Paul conclude? “Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.” That is what happened to Hagar and her son Ishamel, they are cast out from before Abraham. And this is what must happen to the law, it must be cast out. The law is not co-heir with faith. The law has no standing in comparison to the covenant made with Abraham.
Paul makes an astounding argument in the third chapter, here it is:
Gal 3:6-18 (KJV) “Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.”
Let’s take this portion of the Word piece by piece. First we read that Abraham attains a righteous standing before God because he believed God not because he kept the law, he believed. According to Paul, this is a staggering statement in my opinion, the gospel was first preached to Abraham! And because God knew the gentiles would receive their blessing, their redemption through faith, God first gave that gospel, of faith, believing, to the man who first believed; Abraham.
Now, Paul continues to write the following: “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.” In another letter Paul says that the law deceived him. How could that be? The answer may not be obvious but it is simple; the law promised blessings, but these blessings could only be obtained if one kept the whole law. The deception was this; no one could keep the whole law, no one! Here it is in Paul’s words: “But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith….” What a catch 22! The reality is this; the law wasn’t given as a means to obtain the full blessings of God it was given to keep mankind in check until the “seed” would come and confirm the covenant made with Abraham, a covenant of faith, faith in the Messiah Jesus Christ. Believers today are not blessed, saved by the law! We are all blessed, saved by grace, by faith in Christ!
Continuing in Paul’s letter we read: Gal 3:13-18 (KJV) “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.”
What could be more obvious “Christ has redeemed us from the CURSE of the law…” Why? “That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.” Look, Christ fulfilled the law, those laws that demanded sacrifice, rituals, etc. He became The Lamb, The Sacrifice once for all. We are not under the touch not taste not laws. We are not under any ceremonial laws. We are not under any religious laws. We are under the promise by faith in Christ.
Paul continues his argument by pointing out the priority of the covenant with Abraham. A couple of things set them apart. First the covenant with Abraham took place 430 years before the law was given. Clearly the covenant of promise, faith is first. Another thing of importance is this; when the covenant is given, or cut, with Abraham, Abraham is asleep! Heb 6:13-14 (KJV) “For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself, Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee.” God made the covenant unilaterally, on His own. However, when the law is given it is given by means of angels and a mediator; Moses, and the people have to agree to it, accept it. Again the covenant with Abraham is the greater of the two.
Clearly there is no reason for a believer to think that he/she must keep the law, any of the laws. Our moral code derives not from a system of promised rewards and punishments but from our love of Christ. We discipline our selves, our appetites because we love God not because we fear punishment or curses. Our covenant with God is through Jesus Christ not the law.
So I ask you, what are you doing going back to the law? Or as Paul wrote it “who has bewitched you…???”
Blessings
Hal
haroldballew@yahoo.com